Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 9, 2011, 3:29 a.m. EDT
Hi,
I suggest you build 2 free triangular, ther first for the thin layer and the second for the others. For the thin layer, you might want to add two distribution node and specify a pretty high number of elements, to be sure to have a mesh thin enough. the two others will adapt at the neighborhood of the thin one to the distribution nodes, and you can after specify a size for each free triangular to tweak it as you prefer...
Good luck
Hi,
I suggest you build 2 free triangular, ther first for the thin layer and the second for the others. For the thin layer, you might want to add two distribution node and specify a pretty high number of elements, to be sure to have a mesh thin enough. the two others will adapt at the neighborhood of the thin one to the distribution nodes, and you can after specify a size for each free triangular to tweak it as you prefer...
Good luck
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 10, 2011, 3:53 p.m. EDT
im trying to mesh part of the thin layer using free triangular and a distribution set to 10 ( i labeled it side1, one of the copper electrodes) but it is taking quite a long time, even with my i7 sandy bridge cpu. Im not sure if im doing what you described. Do you mind meshing a section of it for me as an example? my email is chowryan@gmail.com
Thanks,
Ryan Chow
im trying to mesh part of the thin layer using free triangular and a distribution set to 10 ( i labeled it side1, one of the copper electrodes) but it is taking quite a long time, even with my i7 sandy bridge cpu. Im not sure if im doing what you described. Do you mind meshing a section of it for me as an example? my email is chowryan@gmail.com
Thanks,
Ryan Chow
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 10, 2011, 4:41 p.m. EDT
ok i tried following your advice but am not sure if it is correct. the mesh completes to 100% (after about an hour or so) but at the last moment gives errors on several of the thin faces. Ive attached some jpegs showing the mesh settings and errors.
Thanks!
ok i tried following your advice but am not sure if it is correct. the mesh completes to 100% (after about an hour or so) but at the last moment gives errors on several of the thin faces. Ive attached some jpegs showing the mesh settings and errors.
Thanks!
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 15, 2011, 2:36 a.m. EDT
bump?
bump?
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 17, 2011, 1:58 a.m. EDT
Hi
One question: why do you mesh your "thin" copper layers as bulk 3D devices ?, do you exepect gradients in the thickness ?
I would suggest to remove these thin volumes and use "surface physics", and as everything is square you could use a simple mapped mesh overall
Take a look at the doc about "thin layers"
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
One question: why do you mesh your "thin" copper layers as bulk 3D devices ?, do you exepect gradients in the thickness ?
I would suggest to remove these thin volumes and use "surface physics", and as everything is square you could use a simple mapped mesh overall
Take a look at the doc about "thin layers"
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 28, 2013, 6:46 p.m. EST
Hi
One question: why do you mesh your "thin" copper layers as bulk 3D devices ?, do you exepect gradients in the thickness ?
I would suggest to remove these thin volumes and use "surface physics", and as everything is square you could use a simple mapped mesh overall
Take a look at the doc about "thin layers"
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Ivar,
this problem is old but I have exactly the same problem and I haven't found any other problems similar to this one in the forum.
I need to study the eigenfrequency of a quartz tuning fork with thin layers of gold around it (they form the electrodes).
Sorry but I haven't found the doc "surface physics" you suggested some years ago, maybe they have removed it.
Thank you,
Giorgio Bernardini
[QUOTE]
Hi
One question: why do you mesh your "thin" copper layers as bulk 3D devices ?, do you exepect gradients in the thickness ?
I would suggest to remove these thin volumes and use "surface physics", and as everything is square you could use a simple mapped mesh overall
Take a look at the doc about "thin layers"
--
Good luck
Ivar
[/QUOTE]
Hi Ivar,
this problem is old but I have exactly the same problem and I haven't found any other problems similar to this one in the forum.
I need to study the eigenfrequency of a quartz tuning fork with thin layers of gold around it (they form the electrodes).
Sorry but I haven't found the doc "surface physics" you suggested some years ago, maybe they have removed it.
Thank you,
Giorgio Bernardini