Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

cell Reynold number

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Dear all,

I have some confusion regarding cell Reynold number option provided in COMSOL post-processing. What I understand is that cell Reynold number is calculated with velocity and length within/from a mesh element. Is it correct? If it is, it will show changes/different value of cell Re when i applied different mesh size, right?
So my question here is, what is the function/usage of cell Reynold number? or in what case it is normally applied?

Thanks a lot!

6 Replies Last Post Sep 16, 2017, 3:06 a.m. EDT
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Dec 28, 2011, 12:07 p.m. EST
Hi

Well if you take the definition of the Reynolds number, i.e. from your CFD books or just from

www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Reynolds_number

You will see that the "relative importance of inertial and viscous forces in a flow" is iven by Re but it contains a "characteristic length" scale value "L" in [m]. COMSOL cannot say what this value is, often it's related to the pipe diameter, but what if your fluid domain is no pipe ? How can COMSOl know?
However, the mesh average size "h" is known and that also gives you an indication how well the mesh resolves the physical inertial and viscous forces which for me is the reason you have the "Cell Reynolds" number in COMSOL.

I treat it that way, and consider it as an indication of the Reynolds number of my flow, and how I can resolve any turbulence versus laminar flow. But there are better CFD specialist out here that have probably more elaborated explanations, and some practical absolute values to use as scale for Cell Reynolds number considerations

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Well if you take the definition of the Reynolds number, i.e. from your CFD books or just from http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Reynolds_number You will see that the "relative importance of inertial and viscous forces in a flow" is iven by Re but it contains a "characteristic length" scale value "L" in [m]. COMSOL cannot say what this value is, often it's related to the pipe diameter, but what if your fluid domain is no pipe ? How can COMSOl know? However, the mesh average size "h" is known and that also gives you an indication how well the mesh resolves the physical inertial and viscous forces which for me is the reason you have the "Cell Reynolds" number in COMSOL. I treat it that way, and consider it as an indication of the Reynolds number of my flow, and how I can resolve any turbulence versus laminar flow. But there are better CFD specialist out here that have probably more elaborated explanations, and some practical absolute values to use as scale for Cell Reynolds number considerations -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Jul 13, 2012, 12:54 p.m. EDT
Hi,

I also find the cell Reynolds number little confusing. When I plot the volume-plot cell Reynolds number in COMSOL, the maximum value is almost 10 time lower than what I compute analytically. Is it OK to have such discrepancy?

Thanks,
Kapil
Hi, I also find the cell Reynolds number little confusing. When I plot the volume-plot cell Reynolds number in COMSOL, the maximum value is almost 10 time lower than what I compute analytically. Is it OK to have such discrepancy? Thanks, Kapil

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Jul 14, 2012, 11:53 a.m. EDT
Hi

Check the definition of the "cell Reaynolds" number its based on "h" the average mesh size and not on the geometry size, so it is not to confuse with a standard pipe flow Reynolds number. It is coherent for a regular mesh, but requires some adaption for elongated mesh shapes

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Check the definition of the "cell Reaynolds" number its based on "h" the average mesh size and not on the geometry size, so it is not to confuse with a standard pipe flow Reynolds number. It is coherent for a regular mesh, but requires some adaption for elongated mesh shapes -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Oct 18, 2013, 2:19 p.m. EDT
Hi,

So how can we use cell Reynolds number if it varies with how fine the mesh is.

Thanks,
Yilin
Hi, So how can we use cell Reynolds number if it varies with how fine the mesh is. Thanks, Yilin

Bo Gao Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago Sep 11, 2017, 8:15 p.m. EDT
Hi Ivar,

I do not think the difference is due to the characeristic length. In my opinion, the cell Reynolds number defined in COMSOL is based on velocity increment (delta_u or relative velocity) in each cell while not the absolute velocity used in the common definition of Reynolds number. The velocity increment (delta_u) is much smaller than the absolute velocity. That's why the spf.cellRe calculated in COMSOL is so small.
I am not an expert in CFD either. This is just my thought. Thanks.
Hi Ivar, I do not think the difference is due to the characeristic length. In my opinion, the cell Reynolds number defined in COMSOL is based on velocity increment (delta_u or relative velocity) in each cell while not the absolute velocity used in the common definition of Reynolds number. The velocity increment (delta_u) is much smaller than the absolute velocity. That's why the spf.cellRe calculated in COMSOL is so small. I am not an expert in CFD either. This is just my thought. Thanks.

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago Sep 16, 2017, 3:06 a.m. EDT
Updated: 7 years ago Sep 16, 2017, 3:08 a.m. EDT

Hi I agree, I'm missing a good explanation from COMSOL (i.e. in the doc/help) how the Cell Reynolds number can be related to the classical Engineering one. And how really to use it as a quality measure, with some good examples. Perhaps they are tuned in to give us some hnts here ?

"My way" has always to ensure Cell Reynolds number "reasonably" uniform within a domain, and more or less comparable to the classical one for the different flow types. Even for my clients, I mostly reject to push my models into the turbulent regime, estimating it's a domain where you need far more specific experience than what I have, and can manage to get in the active time left. Anyhow I know a few specialists to whom I'm happy to subcontract turbulent flows to.

-------------------
Have fun COMSOLing,
Sincerely,
Ivar
Hi I agree, I'm missing a good explanation from COMSOL (i.e. in the doc/help) how the Cell Reynolds number can be related to the classical Engineering one. And how really to use it as a quality measure, with some good examples. Perhaps they are tuned in to give us some hnts here ? "My way" has always to ensure Cell Reynolds number "reasonably" uniform within a domain, and more or less comparable to the classical one for the different flow types. Even for my clients, I mostly reject to push my models into the turbulent regime, estimating it's a domain where you need far more specific experience than what I have, and can manage to get in the active time left. Anyhow I know a few specialists to whom I'm happy to subcontract turbulent flows to.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.