Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
Mar 12, 2020, 11:21 a.m. EDT
Updated:
5 years ago
Mar 12, 2020, 11:23 a.m. EDT
Maybe. I don't think it is possible to give a reliable answer to your question without more information about your model, mesh, the physics being modeled, etc. I suggest that you post your model to the forum so that others may look at it and offer suggestions.
Alternatively, use a much finer mesh, and/or higher-order elements, and re-run your model. If the integrated value that you are talking about gets much closer to zero, then it may indeed be simply a result of numerical error.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Maybe. I don't think it is possible to give a reliable answer to your question without more information about your model, mesh, the physics being modeled, etc. I suggest that you post your model to the forum so that others may look at it and offer suggestions.
Alternatively, use a much finer mesh, and/or higher-order elements, and re-run your model. If the integrated value that you are talking about gets much closer to zero, then it may indeed be simply a result of numerical error.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
Mar 12, 2020, 3:38 p.m. EDT
Indeed, I realize that I haven't given much information, but I did use a finer mesh and higher order elements and the integration approaches zero. Also, I noticed that the integration is greater in areas where the dependent variable varies more, so I think it is due to numerical errors.
Thank you,
Alex
Indeed, I realize that I haven't given much information, but I did use a finer mesh and higher order elements and the integration approaches zero. Also, I noticed that the integration is greater in areas where the dependent variable varies more, so I think it is due to numerical errors.
Thank you,
Alex