Hello Bradley Fontenault
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 15, 2013, 11:01 a.m. EDT
Hi Brad,
I was wondering if you ever figured out how to couple the two physics involving porous media (heat transfer and flow)? I am working on something similar, where I need to remove heat from a porous media by blowing air through it, but I can't seem to get flow to occur through the porous media.
Thank you in advance for any help you can provide,
Alfredo
Hi Brad,
I was wondering if you ever figured out how to couple the two physics involving porous media (heat transfer and flow)? I am working on something similar, where I need to remove heat from a porous media by blowing air through it, but I can't seem to get flow to occur through the porous media.
Thank you in advance for any help you can provide,
Alfredo
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Nov 9, 2013, 2:13 p.m. EST
Hi, I have a similar problem, i have to simulate a warm air blow that goes through gravel.. do I have to use the Darcy's Flow and Heat Transfer in Porous Media?How can I combine them?Thanks,
Stefano.
Hi, I have a similar problem, i have to simulate a warm air blow that goes through gravel.. do I have to use the Darcy's Flow and Heat Transfer in Porous Media?How can I combine them?Thanks,
Stefano.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 10, 2013, 7:00 a.m. EST
Hi guys,
If anyone managed to solve this problem, it will be a great help if you describe how you did it.
Hi guys,
If anyone managed to solve this problem, it will be a great help if you describe how you did it.
Sven Friedel
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 11, 2013, 5:33 a.m. EST
Hi,
this is actually quite simple. An easy example can be given by modifying this model available in the Subsurface Flow model Library:
www.ch.comsol.com/model/free-convection-in-porous-medium-278
1) Draw a square in the middle.
2) Deactivate the new domain in the Brinkman Eq. because it shall be the non-porous part, that will take part only in the heat transfer but not the flow.
3) Right click on Heat Transfer in Porous Media and Add a Feature "Heat Transfer in Solids" specify the thermal properties of the domain.
Compute.
That should be it - you have the porous and non-porous parts "talking" to each other and need only one interface.
Best regards,
Sven Friedel
Hi,
this is actually quite simple. An easy example can be given by modifying this model available in the Subsurface Flow model Library:
http://www.ch.comsol.com/model/free-convection-in-porous-medium-278
1) Draw a square in the middle.
2) Deactivate the new domain in the Brinkman Eq. because it shall be the non-porous part, that will take part only in the heat transfer but not the flow.
3) Right click on Heat Transfer in Porous Media and Add a Feature "Heat Transfer in Solids" specify the thermal properties of the domain.
Compute.
That should be it - you have the porous and non-porous parts "talking" to each other and need only one interface.
Best regards,
Sven Friedel
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 22, 2013, 12:30 a.m. EST
Hi,
this is actually quite simple. An easy example can be given by modifying this model available in the Subsurface Flow model Library:
www.ch.comsol.com/model/free-convection-in-porous-medium-278
1) Draw a square in the middle.
2) Deactivate the new domain in the Brinkman Eq. because it shall be the non-porous part, that will take part only in the heat transfer but not the flow.
3) Right click on Heat Transfer in Porous Media and Add a Feature "Heat Transfer in Solids" specify the thermal properties of the domain.
Compute.
That should be it - you have the porous and non-porous parts "talking" to each other and need only one interface.
Best regards,
Sven Friedel
Hi,
I've actually download this file. however, there is something I couldn't figure out yet, I understand that we can use the velocity from Brinkman Eq. as velocity field to the heat transfer in porous media, but how can we use the temperature as input in Brinkman eq. so that we have two way coupling.
I would really appreciate any help.
thanks,
Manar
[QUOTE]
Hi,
this is actually quite simple. An easy example can be given by modifying this model available in the Subsurface Flow model Library:
http://www.ch.comsol.com/model/free-convection-in-porous-medium-278
1) Draw a square in the middle.
2) Deactivate the new domain in the Brinkman Eq. because it shall be the non-porous part, that will take part only in the heat transfer but not the flow.
3) Right click on Heat Transfer in Porous Media and Add a Feature "Heat Transfer in Solids" specify the thermal properties of the domain.
Compute.
That should be it - you have the porous and non-porous parts "talking" to each other and need only one interface.
Best regards,
Sven Friedel
[/QUOTE]
Hi,
I've actually download this file. however, there is something I couldn't figure out yet, I understand that we can use the velocity from Brinkman Eq. as velocity field to the heat transfer in porous media, but how can we use the temperature as input in Brinkman eq. so that we have two way coupling.
I would really appreciate any help.
thanks,
Manar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 24, 2014, 7:51 a.m. EDT
Hi,
I am building a model and my final objective is to know the temperature of the air in the outlet in a porous channel. I have done this:
- physics Brinkman equation
- physics Heat transfer in Fluids (to know the the heat transfer in the air) and in Heat Transfer in Solids ( to know the heat transfer in the channel) .
I used the following boundary conditions:
Brinkman eq.
- initial values: u=(0,01;0;0) m/s , p=0,01 Pa
- inlet: normal inflow, u=0,01 m/s
- outlet: p=0 Pa
HT in Solids
- thermal insulation except on the front facing the air
- initial values of the channel 800°C
- Surface-to-surface radiation (to simulate radiation inside the channel) with emissivity=0,4 and Tamb=20°C
HT in Fluids
- NO thermal insulation
- Initial values: T=20°C
- Temperature: T=150°C
- Outflow: outlet convective flow
- Heat source (absorption of the solar radiation of the channel as well as the heat transfer to the fluid )
An error is appearing
"Failed to find a solution.
In segregated group 1:
Divergence of the linear iterations.
There was a warning message from the linear solver.
Ill-conditioned preconditioner. Increase factor in error estimate.
Returned solution is not converged.
- Feature: Stationary Solver 1 (sol1/s1)"
It is because the 3 physics might be not coupled? How to couple the 3 physics?
Thank you and best regards,
Ana Tostao
Hi,
I am building a model and my final objective is to know the temperature of the air in the outlet in a porous channel. I have done this:
- physics Brinkman equation
- physics Heat transfer in Fluids (to know the the heat transfer in the air) and in Heat Transfer in Solids ( to know the heat transfer in the channel) .
I used the following boundary conditions:
Brinkman eq.
- initial values: u=(0,01;0;0) m/s , p=0,01 Pa
- inlet: normal inflow, u=0,01 m/s
- outlet: p=0 Pa
HT in Solids
- thermal insulation except on the front facing the air
- initial values of the channel 800°C
- Surface-to-surface radiation (to simulate radiation inside the channel) with emissivity=0,4 and Tamb=20°C
HT in Fluids
- NO thermal insulation
- Initial values: T=20°C
- Temperature: T=150°C
- Outflow: outlet convective flow
- Heat source (absorption of the solar radiation of the channel as well as the heat transfer to the fluid )
An error is appearing
"Failed to find a solution.
In segregated group 1:
Divergence of the linear iterations.
There was a warning message from the linear solver.
Ill-conditioned preconditioner. Increase factor in error estimate.
Returned solution is not converged.
- Feature: Stationary Solver 1 (sol1/s1)"
It is because the 3 physics might be not coupled? How to couple the 3 physics?
Thank you and best regards,
Ana Tostao