Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
Mar 4, 2021, 7:45 p.m. EST
If I recall correctly, it's considered a bad idea, due to the numerical operations that are involved in finding solutions (when using the electric current module), to set the conductivity to zero.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
If I recall correctly, it's considered a bad idea, due to the numerical operations that are involved in finding solutions (when using the electric current module), to set the conductivity to zero.
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
Mar 5, 2021, 3:15 a.m. EST
Indeed in most cases even the solver would not converge with zero conductivity in EC physics.
Cheers
Edgar
-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Indeed in most cases even the solver would not converge with zero conductivity in EC physics.
Cheers
Edgar
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
Mar 5, 2021, 10:18 a.m. EST
Updated:
4 years ago
Mar 5, 2021, 10:19 a.m. EST
The electric current equation is div(-sigma gradV)=0, so when sigma=0 it reduces to 0=0 and gives no way to solve for V. In more sophisticated terms, the Jacobian ("stiffness matrix" in mechanical terminology) is singular and cannot be inverted.
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
The electric current equation is div(-sigma gradV)=0, so when sigma=0 it reduces to 0=0 and gives no way to solve for V. In more sophisticated terms, the Jacobian ("stiffness matrix" in mechanical terminology) is singular and cannot be inverted.
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
Mar 5, 2021, 11:20 a.m. EST
Updated:
4 years ago
Mar 23, 2021, 1:04 p.m. EDT
Thanks for the help. I am actually having the same issue when I put a very low number for the conductivity (For both conductivity being zero and a very small number, the solution converged) but I am getting different values in my electric force when using Electrostac vs EC. In fact the material I am using is an insulator with a relative permittivity of 40. I guess I am trying to understand what is the physics that results in such a difference in the electric force results. Could that be because the Electrostatic equations are solved in steady state and do not consider the transient at the moment when the step voltage is applied, while EC does?
Thanks
Thanks for the help. I am actually having the same issue when I put a very low number for the conductivity (For both conductivity being zero and a very small number, the solution converged) but I am getting different values in my electric force when using Electrostac vs EC. In fact the material I am using is an insulator with a relative permittivity of 40. I guess I am trying to understand what is the physics that results in such a difference in the electric force results. Could that be because the Electrostatic equations are solved in steady state and do not consider the transient at the moment when the step voltage is applied, while EC does?
Thanks