Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 7, 2012, 12:56 a.m. EST
Hi
3D indeed tend to get very Biiiig and RAM consuming ;)
a few tricks: cqan you use symmetry, to divide our model in 1/ 1/4 or even 1/8 or more ?, can you use 2D as the variations along one axis is small, or do you have a shape very looong, so that the section can be reduced to a point, or do you have cylindrical symmetry, then 2D-axi or 1D axi even is much quicker to solve
Once you have solved for 2D-axi or 2D you can map it back to 3D to give 3D views
Note: COMSOL solves always in 3D, but when you select 2D, the formulas are simplified, and the variables are considered per 1 meter in depth (Z) with no gradients along Z, (or 1 meter square in the section Y-Z perpendicular to the line direction X)
Welcome to the real world :)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
3D indeed tend to get very Biiiig and RAM consuming ;)
a few tricks: cqan you use symmetry, to divide our model in 1/ 1/4 or even 1/8 or more ?, can you use 2D as the variations along one axis is small, or do you have a shape very looong, so that the section can be reduced to a point, or do you have cylindrical symmetry, then 2D-axi or 1D axi even is much quicker to solve
Once you have solved for 2D-axi or 2D you can map it back to 3D to give 3D views
Note: COMSOL solves always in 3D, but when you select 2D, the formulas are simplified, and the variables are considered per 1 meter in depth (Z) with no gradients along Z, (or 1 meter square in the section Y-Z perpendicular to the line direction X)
Welcome to the real world :)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 7, 2012, 2:41 p.m. EST
Thank you for your helpful suggestions, Ivar!
I am also wondering when COMSOL will support GPU during the solution process.
I will at least need hundreds of GB's if I make my 3D model close to reality (subsurface
flow and heat transport with boreholes). Sounds like GPU might be able to get me there,
unless I spend >$15K to buy a super computer.
G
Hi
3D indeed tend to get very Biiiig and RAM consuming ;)
a few tricks: cqan you use symmetry, to divide our model in 1/ 1/4 or even 1/8 or more ?, can you use 2D as the variations along one axis is small, or do you have a shape very looong, so that the section can be reduced to a point, or do you have cylindrical symmetry, then 2D-axi or 1D axi even is much quicker to solve
Once you have solved for 2D-axi or 2D you can map it back to 3D to give 3D views
Note: COMSOL solves always in 3D, but when you select 2D, the formulas are simplified, and the variables are considered per 1 meter in depth (Z) with no gradients along Z, (or 1 meter square in the section Y-Z perpendicular to the line direction X)
Welcome to the real world :)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Thank you for your helpful suggestions, Ivar!
I am also wondering when COMSOL will support GPU during the solution process.
I will at least need hundreds of GB's if I make my 3D model close to reality (subsurface
flow and heat transport with boreholes). Sounds like GPU might be able to get me there,
unless I spend >$15K to buy a super computer.
G
[QUOTE]
Hi
3D indeed tend to get very Biiiig and RAM consuming ;)
a few tricks: cqan you use symmetry, to divide our model in 1/ 1/4 or even 1/8 or more ?, can you use 2D as the variations along one axis is small, or do you have a shape very looong, so that the section can be reduced to a point, or do you have cylindrical symmetry, then 2D-axi or 1D axi even is much quicker to solve
Once you have solved for 2D-axi or 2D you can map it back to 3D to give 3D views
Note: COMSOL solves always in 3D, but when you select 2D, the formulas are simplified, and the variables are considered per 1 meter in depth (Z) with no gradients along Z, (or 1 meter square in the section Y-Z perpendicular to the line direction X)
Welcome to the real world :)
--
Good luck
Ivar
[/QUOTE]