Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 26, 2013, 11:02 a.m. EDT
Your model is ill-posed because nothing is preventing the geometry from sliding in the z direction. You can prevent that by imposing a prescribed displacement of 0 in the z direction at point 5 for instance.
Note also that the file you attached is not applying a pressure but rather a vertical force to boundaries 6 and 7.
Jeff
Your model is ill-posed because nothing is preventing the geometry from sliding in the z direction. You can prevent that by imposing a prescribed displacement of 0 in the z direction at point 5 for instance.
Note also that the file you attached is not applying a pressure but rather a vertical force to boundaries 6 and 7.
Jeff
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 26, 2013, 11:04 a.m. EDT
Hi
you have not put any pressure but a vertical load, that means your part is accelerated vertically with no limits. You should ensure your model is restrained in all 6 doF (at least 3 for 2D axi), you have restricted 2 of3 one remains fully free.
if you rely only on forces, your system might run off by numerical integration on small errors, you need some "anti-windup" concept here to, as used in control theory, for that a simple "soft enough" spring (along Z motion here) well might do the job
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
you have not put any pressure but a vertical load, that means your part is accelerated vertically with no limits. You should ensure your model is restrained in all 6 doF (at least 3 for 2D axi), you have restricted 2 of3 one remains fully free.
if you rely only on forces, your system might run off by numerical integration on small errors, you need some "anti-windup" concept here to, as used in control theory, for that a simple "soft enough" spring (along Z motion here) well might do the job
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 26, 2013, 11:09 a.m. EDT
Hi Jeff
Thank you. I agree about the pressure, sorry my mistake.
Concerning the boundary 5, I thouhgt it could be moving in the z direction like the 2 and 4 boundaries that are free. I'm not sure if i understand that!
Hi Jeff
Thank you. I agree about the pressure, sorry my mistake.
Concerning the boundary 5, I thouhgt it could be moving in the z direction like the 2 and 4 boundaries that are free. I'm not sure if i understand that!
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 26, 2013, 12:04 p.m. EDT
Hi Nick,
I am talking about point 5, not boundary 5.
I suggested prescribing that point's vertical displacement to zero (rather than any other point's) because it will get you a nice symmetric solution.
Jeff
Hi Nick,
I am talking about point 5, not boundary 5.
I suggested prescribing that point's vertical displacement to zero (rather than any other point's) because it will get you a nice symmetric solution.
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 26, 2013, 3:37 p.m. EDT
thanks it works perfectly!
thanks it works perfectly!