Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Error in swept of a mapped/quad mesh
Posted May 13, 2013, 2:07 p.m. EDT Mesh Version 4.3a 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear all,
I am getting a problem in the meshing of a multilayer, composed of 3 very thin layers (0.3, 0.01, 0.04 mm). I want to mesh them using a mapped mesh, and then swept (using one swept for all the layers, since the width and the depth of the layers are equal)
It works initially, but then when I want to refine the mapped mesh (passing from the default, Normal, to Fine or more), I will get an error in the swept operation, that is: "Mesh on source and destination edge do not match." and the edges involved in this problem are both on the thinnest layer (the intermediate one).
Same problem if I use the similar Quad mesh.
I attach a model-example of the problem
I am not really able to manage this problem, does anybody encounter this odd problem?
Thank you for any suggestion
Fabio
I am getting a problem in the meshing of a multilayer, composed of 3 very thin layers (0.3, 0.01, 0.04 mm). I want to mesh them using a mapped mesh, and then swept (using one swept for all the layers, since the width and the depth of the layers are equal)
It works initially, but then when I want to refine the mapped mesh (passing from the default, Normal, to Fine or more), I will get an error in the swept operation, that is: "Mesh on source and destination edge do not match." and the edges involved in this problem are both on the thinnest layer (the intermediate one).
Same problem if I use the similar Quad mesh.
I attach a model-example of the problem
I am not really able to manage this problem, does anybody encounter this odd problem?
Thank you for any suggestion
Fabio
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post May 15, 2013, 1:59 a.m. EDT
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hello Fabio,
As we discuss:
The best way is to create a mapped mesh and then sweep the domains separately i.e. swept mesh "in cascade".
Look at the attached model.
Très cordialement,
Thierry
As we discuss:
The best way is to create a mapped mesh and then sweep the domains separately i.e. swept mesh "in cascade".
Look at the attached model.
Très cordialement,
Thierry
Attachments: