Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 12, 2013, 2:37 a.m. EDT
Hello,
the webpage that your link points to has data of relative permeability, but the BH(or HB)-curves
in Comsol have the magnetic field strength. Is that was is different? I did not convert the that
to check.
Regards
Jens
Hello,
the webpage that your link points to has data of relative permeability, but the BH(or HB)-curves
in Comsol have the magnetic field strength. Is that was is different? I did not convert the that
to check.
Regards
Jens
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 12, 2013, 8:03 a.m. EDT
That's right, but if you tried to convert, there will be a huge difference !.
Can anyone at least provide the H(knee) for Soft Iron?
Thanks Jens,
That's right, but if you tried to convert, there will be a huge difference !.
Can anyone at least provide the H(knee) for Soft Iron?
Thanks Jens,
Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 12, 2013, 11:12 p.m. EDT
The following is useful, at least for relatively strong fields.
First, recall that B = mu_0 * mu_r * H
For type-1010 steel (which has much similarity to soft iron) the following expression provides a reasonable fit over a wide range:
mu_r = 1.0 + 2500*(1-tanh(2.7*B)^450)
where B is expressed in Tesla.
tanh = hyperbolic tangent.
So, to clarify: Compute tanh of 2.7*B. Then raise that to the 450 power. Subtract that result from 1. Multiply by 2500. Then add 1. And that will get you a surprisingly good approximation to mu_r.
I hope that helps.
The following is useful, at least for relatively strong fields.
First, recall that B = mu_0 * mu_r * H
For type-1010 steel (which has much similarity to soft iron) the following expression provides a reasonable fit over a wide range:
mu_r = 1.0 + 2500*(1-tanh(2.7*B)^450)
where B is expressed in Tesla.
tanh = hyperbolic tangent.
So, to clarify: Compute tanh of 2.7*B. Then raise that to the 450 power. Subtract that result from 1. Multiply by 2500. Then add 1. And that will get you a surprisingly good approximation to mu_r.
I hope that helps.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 13, 2013, 9:33 a.m. EDT
That's helpful
I don't know how to thank you Robert :)
But can I ask how could one get like this expression for other Ferro's ?
regards
That's helpful
I don't know how to thank you Robert :)
But can I ask how could one get like this expression for other Ferro's ?
regards
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
Mar 8, 2016, 11:46 a.m. EST
Hi Robert,
Could you please give me the reference for this equation:
mu_r = 1.0 + 2500*(1-tanh(2.7*B)^450)
where B is expressed in Tesla.
tanh = hyperbolic tangent.
With regards,
Sumeet
Hi Robert,
Could you please give me the reference for this equation:
mu_r = 1.0 + 2500*(1-tanh(2.7*B)^450)
where B is expressed in Tesla.
tanh = hyperbolic tangent.
With regards,
Sumeet
Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
Apr 5, 2016, 2:29 p.m. EDT
It was from my ad-hoc curve fit to B vs. H data tabulated in Fig. 3, page 5 of: Yadav, S., "Finite Element Magnetic Analysis of the Cornell Three-Pole Wiggler Model," Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) report TD-01-067, Sept. 28, 2001. Note that the report states that the data were "taken from Opera."
It was from my ad-hoc curve fit to B vs. H data tabulated in Fig. 3, page 5 of: Yadav, S., "Finite Element Magnetic Analysis of the Cornell Three-Pole Wiggler Model," Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) report TD-01-067, Sept. 28, 2001. Note that the report states that the data were "taken from Opera."