Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Impedance Cross-Validation

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

I have been conducting some impedance simulations in COMSOL using the emqvw (quasi-electrostatic) application mode, using different microfluidic geometries. The set-up is using the conductivity of deionized water (5.56e-6 S/m) with a dielectric of 80. At one inlet I have assigned a port boundary and another is ground, the rest of the geometry is modelled as electric insulation.

I have been analysing the impedance using abs(Z11_emqvw) and the phase using 180*arg(Z11_emqvw)/pi.

Concurrently, I have been using the same geometries in real-life experiments and have found that the COMSOL impedance results are several of order of magnitude higher.

I am unsure of what may be missing from my model to accurately describe the impedance of the system.

Any thoughts?

Regards,
Tom

0 Replies Last Post Apr 22, 2010, 4:29 p.m. EDT
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Tom Myers

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.