Zoran Vidakovic, COMSOL
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jul 28, 2010, 3:46 a.m. EDT
Hi Markus
Can you post some screenshots or your model here in order to see the problem?
If the file size is too big (>5MB) please create a new simple model from scratch and try to reproduce this issue and send it to me.
Best,
Zoran
Hi Markus
Can you post some screenshots or your model here in order to see the problem?
If the file size is too big (>5MB) please create a new simple model from scratch and try to reproduce this issue and send it to me.
Best,
Zoran
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jul 28, 2010, 7:52 a.m. EDT
Hi Zoran,
thanks for your reply.
I have attached a screenshot of the situation. The fluid volume (air) fills all of the enclosure
and this is what I get for 20 startpoint-controlled streamlines.
Best Markus
Hi Zoran,
thanks for your reply.
I have attached a screenshot of the situation. The fluid volume (air) fills all of the enclosure
and this is what I get for 20 startpoint-controlled streamlines.
Best Markus
Zoran Vidakovic, COMSOL
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jul 28, 2010, 8:15 a.m. EDT
Interesting.
What are your settings of streamline?
Try another positioning method "Uniform density" and chose an appropriate "Separating distance" (see attached figure).
Zoran
Interesting.
What are your settings of streamline?
Try another positioning method "Uniform density" and chose an appropriate "Separating distance" (see attached figure).
Zoran
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jul 28, 2010, 9:00 a.m. EDT
Hi,
thanks again for your quick reply.
I have tried the "seperating distance" and it gives somewhat less awkward results but still looks strange.
If I try to start the streamlines from a useful location (e.g. some inlet boundary) using coordinate
ranges, neither the number of resulting lines nor the starting coords seem to be correct. (See pics)
BTW: This is already 4.0.0.933
Best
Markus
Hi,
thanks again for your quick reply.
I have tried the "seperating distance" and it gives somewhat less awkward results but still looks strange.
If I try to start the streamlines from a useful location (e.g. some inlet boundary) using coordinate
ranges, neither the number of resulting lines nor the starting coords seem to be correct. (See pics)
BTW: This is already 4.0.0.933
Best
Markus
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Sep 22, 2010, 1:42 a.m. EDT
I ran into a similar problem when I was modeling a fluids problems as well. I had what looked like a reasonably good velocity magnitude sectional plots, but then when I tried the streamline a got some segments and only a few lines going through, even though I used 200 startpoints. I refined the mesh and got much better results. I think the velocity field was not accurately defined throughout the volume using my original mesh, so the streamlines were not truly continuous. So maybe try to crank up your mesh density and see how it goes.
Best,
Mike
I ran into a similar problem when I was modeling a fluids problems as well. I had what looked like a reasonably good velocity magnitude sectional plots, but then when I tried the streamline a got some segments and only a few lines going through, even though I used 200 startpoints. I refined the mesh and got much better results. I think the velocity field was not accurately defined throughout the volume using my original mesh, so the streamlines were not truly continuous. So maybe try to crank up your mesh density and see how it goes.
Best,
Mike
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Sep 22, 2010, 1:42 a.m. EDT
I ran into a similar problem when I was modeling a fluids problems as well. I had what looked like a reasonably good velocity magnitude sectional plots, but then when I tried the streamline a got some segments and only a few lines going through, even though I used 200 startpoints. I refined the mesh and got much better results. I think the velocity field was not accurately defined throughout the volume using my original mesh, so the streamlines were not truly continuous. So maybe try to crank up your mesh density and see how it goes.
Best,
Mike
I ran into a similar problem when I was modeling a fluids problems as well. I had what looked like a reasonably good velocity magnitude sectional plots, but then when I tried the streamline a got some segments and only a few lines going through, even though I used 200 startpoints. I refined the mesh and got much better results. I think the velocity field was not accurately defined throughout the volume using my original mesh, so the streamlines were not truly continuous. So maybe try to crank up your mesh density and see how it goes.
Best,
Mike