Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Problem in using Darcy law for merged layers
Posted Aug 27, 2015, 11:35 p.m. EDT 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear all,
I have problem using Darcy law for lumped 2 layer. I have three layers in my model that Darcy law is applied for them. I have hydraulic conductivity value for 3 layers. According to one reason, I need to merge two of three layers into one layer. So when I try to use the merged hydraulic conductivity for lumped layer, the pressure I got, Is much lower than that in original case(3 separate layers). it should not be the case.
In another step, when I put the merged hydraulic conductivity for 2 separate layer, I got the same pressure in each layer as original one. I don't know what is the problem.
I attached the formula I used for merged hydraulic conductivity.
I will appreciate any help.
I have problem using Darcy law for lumped 2 layer. I have three layers in my model that Darcy law is applied for them. I have hydraulic conductivity value for 3 layers. According to one reason, I need to merge two of three layers into one layer. So when I try to use the merged hydraulic conductivity for lumped layer, the pressure I got, Is much lower than that in original case(3 separate layers). it should not be the case.
In another step, when I put the merged hydraulic conductivity for 2 separate layer, I got the same pressure in each layer as original one. I don't know what is the problem.
I attached the formula I used for merged hydraulic conductivity.
I will appreciate any help.
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post Aug 30, 2015, 9:20 p.m. EDT