Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Mar 5, 2011, 3:50 a.m. EST
Hi
I do not believe its already set up as a "pre-cooked" physics, but I do not see why you cannot couple it in yourself, you need to carefully check the interactions and physics link as for any complex multiphysics combination. It's certainly far easier in V4 than V3.5a
Really for these type of questions the bet reply is from your local COMSOL rep, they could even, perhaps, provide you with an example ;)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
I do not believe its already set up as a "pre-cooked" physics, but I do not see why you cannot couple it in yourself, you need to carefully check the interactions and physics link as for any complex multiphysics combination. It's certainly far easier in V4 than V3.5a
Really for these type of questions the bet reply is from your local COMSOL rep, they could even, perhaps, provide you with an example ;)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Mar 5, 2011, 12:08 p.m. EST
Which module of Comsol should I use?
(i) Piezo solid
(ii) Moving mesh (ale)
(iii) Incompresible Navier Stokes
Or
(i) Piezo solid
(ii) Solid, stress-strain
(iii) Moving mesh (ale)
(iv) Incompresible Navier Stokes
If this setting, what is the output of the piezo module that will be the input (Load: Fx, Fy, Fz) to Solid Stress ?
Thanks a lot
Which module of Comsol should I use?
(i) Piezo solid
(ii) Moving mesh (ale)
(iii) Incompresible Navier Stokes
Or
(i) Piezo solid
(ii) Solid, stress-strain
(iii) Moving mesh (ale)
(iv) Incompresible Navier Stokes
If this setting, what is the output of the piezo module that will be the input (Load: Fx, Fy, Fz) to Solid Stress ?
Thanks a lot
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Mar 5, 2011, 2:45 p.m. EST
Hi
that choice depends on the complexity of your model. PZT replaces solid/structural for PZT materials (and even non PZT with some care) so normally no need to add PZT and Structural, except if you have only a few domains tru PZ ad many structural and fluidics, then perhaps you need to add also structural. PZT adds also electric I/F
Navier stokes for the fluid, then depending on the motion you might need ALE, indeed, or at least an extra frame for the deformations
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
that choice depends on the complexity of your model. PZT replaces solid/structural for PZT materials (and even non PZT with some care) so normally no need to add PZT and Structural, except if you have only a few domains tru PZ ad many structural and fluidics, then perhaps you need to add also structural. PZT adds also electric I/F
Navier stokes for the fluid, then depending on the motion you might need ALE, indeed, or at least an extra frame for the deformations
--
Good luck
Ivar