Hello Yoann Many
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Sep 9, 2011, 8:49 a.m. EDT
I'm interested in this topic, too.
Is there anyone who could explain it?
Thx so far
I'm interested in this topic, too.
Is there anyone who could explain it?
Thx so far
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Sep 10, 2011, 4:25 a.m. EDT
Hi
my understanding of the segragated steps are that you might groupe some dependent variables, solve for these and then use the results to solve again with the other set of comlementary dependent variables and then loop around until all variables have reached a reasonnable solution (global estimator is small).
This is particularly useful when you have either independent physics that are wekly linked, or a fast and a slow process. Basically you need less RAM andit solves quicker than if you put everything into the same pot and take all dependent variables in one go.
Then selecting which variables to choose first, second etc is a little tricky, COMSOL tries and achieves it quite well I find, often I can solve everything in one go, sa I have quite some RAM at hand (48Gb), at least for "small models" other times, when you have linked the variables in a way COMSOl does not see (i.e. via material properties etc) COMSOL suggests to regroup all variables in one step..
hope this helps
By the way do not forget the "LM"s that appear when you add complec BC
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
my understanding of the segragated steps are that you might groupe some dependent variables, solve for these and then use the results to solve again with the other set of comlementary dependent variables and then loop around until all variables have reached a reasonnable solution (global estimator is small).
This is particularly useful when you have either independent physics that are wekly linked, or a fast and a slow process. Basically you need less RAM andit solves quicker than if you put everything into the same pot and take all dependent variables in one go.
Then selecting which variables to choose first, second etc is a little tricky, COMSOL tries and achieves it quite well I find, often I can solve everything in one go, sa I have quite some RAM at hand (48Gb), at least for "small models" other times, when you have linked the variables in a way COMSOl does not see (i.e. via material properties etc) COMSOL suggests to regroup all variables in one step..
hope this helps
By the way do not forget the "LM"s that appear when you add complec BC
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Oct 10, 2011, 5:49 p.m. EDT
If for some reason, you end up having only one segregated step for all variables, then will this be the same as using a fully coupled solver?
Thanks,
Sirisha
If for some reason, you end up having only one segregated step for all variables, then will this be the same as using a fully coupled solver?
Thanks,
Sirisha
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Oct 11, 2011, 8:14 a.m. EDT
Hi
no in all cases it a fully coupled solver, the only thing is that the solver loops around in a segregated way.
I would rather say one segregated step = direct solving (TBC it's my first reaction)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
no in all cases it a fully coupled solver, the only thing is that the solver loops around in a segregated way.
I would rather say one segregated step = direct solving (TBC it's my first reaction)
--
Good luck
Ivar