Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Feb 7, 2012, 4:49 a.m. EST
Hi,
I am not Ivar, but this is a forum and not meant for directly adressing specific people. You also enhance your chance of getting response by talking to the forum.
Regarding your question: This appears to be a typical case for a 2D study. This will automatically treat the cable like it was infinitely long and allow you to investigate the cross section.
Cheers
Edgar
Hi,
I am not Ivar, but this is a forum and not meant for directly adressing specific people. You also enhance your chance of getting response by talking to the forum.
Regarding your question: This appears to be a typical case for a 2D study. This will automatically treat the cable like it was infinitely long and allow you to investigate the cross section.
Cheers
Edgar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Feb 7, 2012, 1:14 p.m. EST
Dear Sir
I am so sorry but i didn't meant to ask specific person ( but Ivar has replied my questions since 4 months)
regarding my question
i didn't describe my problem correctly
i have infiniite cable and i don't want to get cross section, i want to study a specific length from the whole length
how can i define the infint length at the boundries?
Dear Sir
I am so sorry but i didn't meant to ask specific person ( but Ivar has replied my questions since 4 months)
regarding my question
i didn't describe my problem correctly
i have infiniite cable and i don't want to get cross section, i want to study a specific length from the whole length
how can i define the infint length at the boundries?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Feb 8, 2012, 8:07 a.m. EST
I don't know if there is a good solution to this. You might check whether 'infinite elements' can address the issue. I never used that so far.
But I want insist a bit on the 2D approach. If the following prerequisites are fulfilled:
- The cable is infinitely long, i.e. much longer than the 0.165 m you are interested in
- The structure of the cable is constant along its length
- The environment outside is constant along the cable
Then you will find constant values along the cable and you can simplify everything to 2D, no?
Cheers
Edgar
I don't know if there is a good solution to this. You might check whether 'infinite elements' can address the issue. I never used that so far.
But I want insist a bit on the 2D approach. If the following prerequisites are fulfilled:
- The cable is infinitely long, i.e. much longer than the 0.165 m you are interested in
- The structure of the cable is constant along its length
- The environment outside is constant along the cable
Then you will find constant values along the cable and you can simplify everything to 2D, no?
Cheers
Edgar