Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

PCF, PML

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

I am designing a PCF with hexagonal pattern having five air hole rings.
pitch = 1 um.
air filling fraction = 0.90
i have used circular PML to get the imaginary part of refractive index.
what should be thickness of PML ?

5 Replies Last Post Feb 15, 2013, 3:10 a.m. EST
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Selim Habib

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.


Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Feb 4, 2013, 12:45 p.m. EST
A good rule of thumb is to make the PML thickness equal to a few times the wavelength you are using.

cheers,
--
Felipe
A good rule of thumb is to make the PML thickness equal to a few times the wavelength you are using. cheers, -- Felipe

Sergei Yushanov Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Feb 4, 2013, 1:02 p.m. EST
Actual thickness of PML domain is not important. Important is to place 4-5 elements through the thickness of PML domain. For better performance, used sweep mesh in 3D PML domain, or mapped mesh in 2D PML domain.

Regards,
Sergei
Actual thickness of PML domain is not important. Important is to place 4-5 elements through the thickness of PML domain. For better performance, used sweep mesh in 3D PML domain, or mapped mesh in 2D PML domain. Regards, Sergei

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Feb 4, 2013, 1:29 p.m. EST
Wow!

learning a new thing everyday, thanks!
--
Felipe
Wow! learning a new thing everyday, thanks! -- Felipe

Sergei Yushanov Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Feb 4, 2013, 1:35 p.m. EST
Additional note regarding PML.

It is true, however, that boundary of PML domain should not be placed too close to the structure. Distance between structure and interior boundary of PML domain should be, at least, comparable to wavelength.

Regards,
Sergei
Additional note regarding PML. It is true, however, that boundary of PML domain should not be placed too close to the structure. Distance between structure and interior boundary of PML domain should be, at least, comparable to wavelength. Regards, Sergei

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago Feb 15, 2013, 3:10 a.m. EST
Thanks every one.

Faced another problem. Now i am designing on hexagonal structure PCF of six air-hole rings and successfully
interface comsol 4.2 with matlab live link. The problem is that it takes a lots of time to simulate in Matlab when simulation is done in matlab.
Is there any procedure to reduce the time.



Thanks in advance.
Thanks every one. Faced another problem. Now i am designing on hexagonal structure PCF of six air-hole rings and successfully interface comsol 4.2 with matlab live link. The problem is that it takes a lots of time to simulate in Matlab when simulation is done in matlab. Is there any procedure to reduce the time. Thanks in advance.