Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Time-dependent heat transfer across a wall - issues with output results
Posted Oct 4, 2023, 5:09 a.m. EDT Mesh, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Studies & Solvers Version 5.3a 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear Community,
I have a problem with my simulation. Currently I am trying to solve a simple heat transfer problem across an externally insulated wall (you can find the file attached). In particolar, conduction inside the solid and convection at the surfaces. The problem is a time-dependent one, in which at the internal side I set 16 °C as air temperature and at the external side I applied an analytical function (sinusoidal). Initial condition inside the solid is 16 °C and convective coefficients are 7.69 and 25 W/m2 K. The simulation is performed with 1 min time-step and it is run for 10 days. The solver adopts the BDF method, and I decided to run a user-controlled tolerance simulation in which a value of 10^-4 and 10^-5 were set for the relative and absolute tolerance, respectively. The methodology I have selected was the manual one and not the factor method. The spatial discretization considered a default mesh, Normal.
The excpected results in terms of total heat fluxes calculated at the surfaces are sinusoidal functions of the time that oscillate around zero. Here it comes the problem, or better to say the problems.
What I get, in the specific, on the internal side, is a sinusoidal wave for the heat flux but not centered on the zero. It is like, i get a positive peak of 0.18 W/m2 and a negative one of -0.25 W/m2. If the magnitude of the heat flux had been higher, clearly this difference would have been negligible but here, since values of heat flux are low, this offset has an important impact. I've been trying to vary differently all the simulation parameters without any satisfactory result. This offset can be present but in percentage terms cannot be higher than 10% (better 7%).
Currently I changed the solver scheme into Runge-Kutta method, as suggested by the Manual for oscillatory problems but I am still waiting for results.
Do you have any suggestions? Has ever someone ecountered the same issue? I would like to understand more about settings of the simulation, e.g., relative and absolute tolerances, and so on. I read the manual but maybe information coming from practical examples can be more useful.
If I forgot some details, please tell me and I will reply.
Thanks for the help.
Attachments: