Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Convergence problems simulating a thin film - structural mechanics coupling
Posted May 5, 2014, 9:40 a.m. EDT Fluid & Heat, Studies & Solvers, Structural Mechanics Version 4.4 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hey everybody!
My goal is to simulate the stresses during a load cycle in a bearing shell.
The problem:
I assembled a journal bearing in con-rod from which i cut off the major part so that the calculation time can be reduced and defined this as union. So I don't have to bother about contact problems. On the surface of the journal bearing I solve the hydrodynamic with help of the thin film module and a PDE which handles the equilibrium of an external force. On the top of the con-rod I fix the structure what seems to me as the best way. Assuming a rigid structure in the first case the simulation works fine until it reaches the physical borders when the time dependent load becomes to high and the fluid film breaks. Therefore I coupled the hydrodynamic with elastomechanic so that the bearing shell can deform and a higher load carrying capacity is possible.
Due to initial value problems I set up an extra study where I calculate an inital status, which acts as an inital solution for instationary time dependent main study.
I made first tests with small loads, checked how to link both physics best,... and it worked fine. Now I have the problem, that I can't reach convergence with the load I'd like to simulate.
The calculation takes very long and it stops at 4 %. Until this point the convergence behaviour looks very good but then it changes, see attached screenshots, and I can't figure out why. In my opinion its not a physical problem because at the time, when the calculation stops the maximum fluid pressure is about 20 bar, the minimum filmthickness at about 20µm whereby the stresses are quite low. I think the problem must be the way the solvers work. I dont have enough experience to cope with this kind of problem. Thats why I would like to ask help from u.
I add some screenshots of the model so u can imagine how it looks like and a screenshots of one of the two solvers. (both have the same specification)
With kind regards,
Philipp
My goal is to simulate the stresses during a load cycle in a bearing shell.
The problem:
I assembled a journal bearing in con-rod from which i cut off the major part so that the calculation time can be reduced and defined this as union. So I don't have to bother about contact problems. On the surface of the journal bearing I solve the hydrodynamic with help of the thin film module and a PDE which handles the equilibrium of an external force. On the top of the con-rod I fix the structure what seems to me as the best way. Assuming a rigid structure in the first case the simulation works fine until it reaches the physical borders when the time dependent load becomes to high and the fluid film breaks. Therefore I coupled the hydrodynamic with elastomechanic so that the bearing shell can deform and a higher load carrying capacity is possible.
Due to initial value problems I set up an extra study where I calculate an inital status, which acts as an inital solution for instationary time dependent main study.
I made first tests with small loads, checked how to link both physics best,... and it worked fine. Now I have the problem, that I can't reach convergence with the load I'd like to simulate.
The calculation takes very long and it stops at 4 %. Until this point the convergence behaviour looks very good but then it changes, see attached screenshots, and I can't figure out why. In my opinion its not a physical problem because at the time, when the calculation stops the maximum fluid pressure is about 20 bar, the minimum filmthickness at about 20µm whereby the stresses are quite low. I think the problem must be the way the solvers work. I dont have enough experience to cope with this kind of problem. Thats why I would like to ask help from u.
I add some screenshots of the model so u can imagine how it looks like and a screenshots of one of the two solvers. (both have the same specification)
With kind regards,
Philipp
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post May 6, 2014, 10:04 a.m. EDT