Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Fixed Constraint in step 2 on a prescribed displacement (elongation) in step 1
Posted Jul 31, 2014, 3:33 p.m. EDT Mesh, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Structural Mechanics Version 4.4 0 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I am looking at stresses near the boundaries of a multistep model. Step 1 is stationary in which I apply a prescribed displacement ranging between 5-30% elongation in the Z direction. In step 2 I apply boundary loads directed in the transverse plane (x and y direction). This requires me to fix the model in the x and y direction in the second step. What is the best way to fix the face in the x and y directions on either end of the model? I have tried it a few different ways and have been unsuccessful, as the x and y constraints in step 2 cause poor behavior in my boundary elements.
First, if I simply have a fixed constraint on one end (fixed in xyz) and a prescribed displacement on the opposite Z end (elongation 5-30% in z direction, 0 displacement in x or y), the solution to the stationary step has extremely high shear stresses at the boundary since edge constraints do not allow for compression at the faces on the z ends of the model as it is fixed in x and y.
I have tried to have different boundary conditions for step 1 and 2, but these solutions are not properly solved and I end up with an essentially exploded model out to infinity. For example, in step one I fixed the model in the Z direction on one Z face, then elongated it in the Z direction on the opposite Z face. No x and y constraints are used in the first step. In the second step, I then use the "modify physics" tool to disable the prescribed displacements and add fixed constraints to the z faces. However, this does not appear to behave as I would like it to. The geometry does not apply fixed constraints on the boundaries of the solution from step 1, and the results are unintelligible. I believe it is applying a fixed constraint on the material coordinates, not at the new deformed spatial coordinates.
Hello Andrew Vamos
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.