Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Global evaluation of ewbe.beta_1 gives same value for all rows (solutions).
Posted Sep 4, 2014, 8:29 a.m. EDT Version 4.4 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I've solved the boundary mode analysis for port 1 like in the "Directional Coupler" model but with the addition of two parametric sweeps (wavelength and dimension).
Now I want to extract the effective mode index for all solutions, so I try making a Global Evaluation but the parameter ewbe.neff (or similar) does not exist as I was hoping so I figured that I could calculate it from ewbe.beta_1/(2*pi/wl) where "wl" is the wavelength parameter. However, the values are the same for each row (or solution) part of the table is shown below:
dimension, wl, solution 1, soution 2...
1.5e-6, 1e-6, 2.21885, 2.21885
1.5e-6, 1.64286e-6, 1.92064, 1.92064
1.5e-6, 2.28571e-6, 1.49211+1.64531e-10i, 1.49211+1.64531e-10i
It seems "ewbe.beta_1" is not updated for each solution of the parametric sweep but only for the different values of dimension and wl in the parametric sweeps.
Maybe there is an even easier way of getting the neff for each solution.
Now I want to extract the effective mode index for all solutions, so I try making a Global Evaluation but the parameter ewbe.neff (or similar) does not exist as I was hoping so I figured that I could calculate it from ewbe.beta_1/(2*pi/wl) where "wl" is the wavelength parameter. However, the values are the same for each row (or solution) part of the table is shown below:
dimension, wl, solution 1, soution 2...
1.5e-6, 1e-6, 2.21885, 2.21885
1.5e-6, 1.64286e-6, 1.92064, 1.92064
1.5e-6, 2.28571e-6, 1.49211+1.64531e-10i, 1.49211+1.64531e-10i
It seems "ewbe.beta_1" is not updated for each solution of the parametric sweep but only for the different values of dimension and wl in the parametric sweeps.
Maybe there is an even easier way of getting the neff for each solution.
3 Replies Last Post Sep 9, 2014, 3:42 p.m. EDT